Health & Wellness: 2022 Valuation Multiples
Although health and wellness have always been central to human societies and economies, their exact definition has changed massively over time according to the values, priorities and habits of the time. Ever since the pandemic, health and wellness started to become synonyms with home workouts, mindfulness, circadian rhythms and many other concepts that were not necessarily considered part of a healthy lifestyle before.
Over time, wellness has become more and more important to the average consumer: a 2021 survey by McKinsey found that 42% of consumers consider wellness a top priority. According to the consulting company, the global market for wellness is now worth around $1.5tn, and is projected to reach between $2.5tn and $4tn in value by 2030.
Once limited to sports equipment and clothing brands, the wellness sector has now expanded into a myriad of segments, with sometimes blurred lines and lots of overlap. Tech-based categories such as Fitness-as-a-Service (think Peloton), TeleHealth apps for mindfulness and mental health and wearable health trackers have been on the rise in the past few years, boosted by the global pandemic.
At the same time, established companies in adjacent sectors have entered the wellness market from multiple sides, like food and beverages, skincare brands, sexual health products and more, benefitting from a widened definition of “wellness” in the consumer’s eyes.
A busy M&A environment underlines this sector’s consolidation, with SD Ventures reporting around 7000 deals in the first half of 2021, with exit multiples on an upwards trajectory over the past 5 years. Some of these deals are worth billions, like Nestle’s acquisition of Bountiful for $5.75bn. Others reflect strategic moves from wellness companies seeking to enters adjacent subsectors, such as athletic clothing brand Lululemon acquiring Peloton competitor Mirror for $500m.
The Global X Health & Wellness ETF (HERO), managed by Mirae Asset Financial Group, “seeks to harness the effects of changing consumer lifestyles by investing in companies geared toward promoting physical activity and well-being.”
The 64 companies in the fund are all listed on public stock exchanges, and so their financial metrics may differ from younger start-ups introducing innovative technologies, typically considered a high-risk-high-reward investment. However, analysing their revenue and EBITDA multiples allows us to establish a benchmark that can be useful to infer the valuation of a private company.
Health & Wellness Valuation Multiples
Predictably, the pandemic accelerated the growth in Revenue multiples for wellness companies, which saw a correction over the course of 2021, although maintaining an upwards trajectory overall.
Median Revenue multiples jumped 70% between Q1 2020 and Q1 2021 before dropping in the second half of 2021. In Q4 2021 the median EV/Revenue multiple for Wellness & Health companies was 1.7x, 30% above pre-pandemic levels.
It is useful in this case to compare these numbers with those of HealthTech and TeleHealth companies, which show higher revenue multiples (5.6x in the second half of 2021).
In our cohort, only companies in the top-25% achieve comparable results, with the highest revenue multiples throughout 2021 being between 20x and 30x.
Source: YCharts In the chart above, the lines indicate the range of EV/Revenue multiples in our cohorts, while the boxes highlight the Interquartile Range (IQR), which is where the median 50% of the cohort ranks based on their valuation multiple.
EV/EBITDA multiples saw less of a correction post-pandemic, reaching their peak at 13.6x in Q2 2021 and then falling slightly. In Q4 2021 the median EV/EBITDA multiple for Health & Wellness companies was 11.9x.
EBITDA multiples for Wellness are analogous to those of HealthTech companies (12.5x in H2 2021), showing that one of the main challenges for wellness is achieving a sufficient profit margin, which is probably easier for tech or software based services than it is for consumer product manufacturers.
EBITDA multiples also show a wider range than their Revenue counterparts, with the median 50% of companies recording multiples between 7x and 23x in the last quarter of 2021.
Source: YCharts In the chart above, the lines indicate the range of EV/EBITDA multiples in our cohorts, while the boxes highlight the Interquartile Range (IQR), which is where the median 50% of the cohort ranks based on their valuation multiple.
Nothing on this page is intended to be or should be construed or taken as accountancy, investment, tax or any other kind of advice. We recommend individuals and companies seek professional advice on their circumstances and matters.